ENDA - Employee Non-Discrimination Act

The Crimes that Reflect its Author - ENDA

 

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is a proposed bill in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity for federal, state (including public schools) and local governments, and civilian nonreligious employers with over 15 employees. These employers will be forced to employ and affirm men who wear dresses—including schoolteachers.

 

• What is Gender Identity? "Gender Identity" is actually a Gender Identity Disorder (GID) listed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association. A GID person thinks he or she is the opposite sex. Through years of perversion and distortion, sick minded people have attempted to create the following definition: A person's Gender Identity is the combination of one's outer sex, as represented by one's genitalia, and one's inner sex, i.e. the inner sense of being a male or a female. One's inner sex may tally with one's outer sex. It may also be different from one's outer sex. There are three main forms of gender: masculine, feminine and neutral.

 

• What is Sexual Orientation? A term frequently used to describe a person’s romantic, emotional or sexual attraction to another person, object or animal; classifications such as heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, etc.

 

ENDA has been introduced in every Congress, except the 109th, since 1994, albeit without gender identity protections. In 2009 only, a transgender-inclusive ENDA has been introduced by House Representative Barney Frank. Barney Frank, the Representative from the state of Massachusetts, is an admitted homosexual whose Washington, D.C. apartment was used to house a gay prostitution ring! It is very clear as to how this bill reflects the crimes of its author. President Barack Obama supports the bill's passage and was quoted as saying that The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is “discriminatory.” Jon Berry, who is the most powerful open homosexual in the Obama administration, was quoted as saying, "If we can get ENDA enacted and signed into law, it is only a matter of time before all the rest (overturning DOMA) happens,” he continued, "It is the keystone that holds up the whole bunch, and so we need to focus our energies and attention there."

 

It seems to me that these representatives and civil servants are choosing politics in order to pass legislation that will protect their (and their interested lobbyist and supporters) unlawful behavior. These are crimes against nature, and they are sins before the God of heaven (Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13).

 

Currently, 38 states do not make "Gender Identity" into a protected minority under law. If Barack Obama signs ENDA, this will change. What supporters of ENDA do not want you to know is that under ENDA, those 38 states' laws will be presumably overruled by federal law.
Every state would then be bullied and harassed to make cross-dressers, drag queens, transsexuals, and she-males (male-female hybrids) into protected classes. Imagine the effect on every school district in America that could potentially be forbidden by policy to reassign any she-male teacher because this would be considered "discrimination." Thus, children will become a target in classrooms taught by men who dress as women, and students will be indoctrinated to affirm that this is normal behavior.

 

I wish I could take you all to a Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transvestite (GLBT) Rally to see how serious these homosexuals are in getting their curriculum taught to our children. This curriculum is unbelievable, face blushing, and would shock any decent law abiding parent and/or citizen. The question is, does anyone know about the onslaught of lobbying, favorable legislation, and persistent educational curriculum of these sodomite activists?

 

As a member of a Christian, Constitutional ministry, I have the opportunity to take part in numerous events. Some events have us confronting and withstanding un-American activities and policies, many of which happen at our very own capitol.

 

At a GLBT lobby day at our capitol in St. Paul, MN, I took the time to confront and withstand some supporters of this GLBT legislation, which included:

• Repealing the “don’t askdon’t tell” policy of our military

• Comprehensive Sexual Education (including teaching about anal and oral sex) of our students in public schools

• Eliminating the term “marriage” and changing it to civil unions • Recognition of same sex civil unions (Men marrying men and women marrying women)

• Passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (Making sodomites and people who have sex changes a protected class of citizens who cannot be fired or refused employment based on their sexual identity)

 

One Jewish Rabbi told me that marriage between two men or two women was a conservative idea. How many of you in America share this man’s sentiments?

 

Why is it that law-abiding conservative people like you and I are constantly looked at by the mainstream media as: close-minded, old fashioned, bigoted, prejudice, and right wing religious discriminators? I often wonder at the fact that such a small minority of radical people in this country can make the majority feel like they are doing something wrong by having the desire of raising our children and grandchildren in the same society that we ourselves were raised in—one where God is the Supreme Ruler, the family was the center of life, we loved our neighbor as ourselves, the Church was the strongest pillar in the community, and everyone had an interest in making sure that our children had an education and future free from obstructing perversions that we heard about in the big city or in other countries.

 

As a realist and a patriot I have full confidence in the Judeo-Christian foundation found in every one of your hearts, yet mankind must respond to his duty or suffer the consequence of immoral minority rule. Thank you for your time and your devotion to our wonderful and free God-given communities that make up this great nation. I end by quoting Samuel Adams; “Shame on the men who can court exemption from present trouble and expense at the price of their own posterity's liberty!”